Surveillance Has No Age Limit

A Lifetime Earned, Privacy Still Taken

#Biometrics

Congressional Leaders who Support our mission

Across party lines, U.S. Senators and Representatives have publicly warned against facial recognition and biometric surveillance systems that undermine privacy, consent, and civil liberties. Through legislation, formal statements, and public testimony, these lawmakers have called for limits, moratoriums, or outright bans on government-mandated biometric technologies, emphasizing constitutional rights, due process, and the long-term risks of unchecked surveillance.

Mike Lee (R-UT)

I’m concerned with the abuse of facial recognition technology across the board, including by the TSA. We need to ensure that law-abiding Americans can go about their lives without constant surveillance by their own government, like in the United Kingdom.

United States Senator

Rand Paul (R-KY)

The bulk collection of Americans’ personal data violates the Fourth Amendment. The Constitution is clear that we are to be secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, and that the government must have probable cause before intruding into our private lives. Collecting information on everyone, without suspicion, turns that principle on its head. A free society cannot exist when the government treats every citizen as a potential suspect and gathers their personal information without consent or a warrant.

United States Senator

Edward Markey (D-MA)

Biometric data collection poses serious risks of privacy invasion and discrimination, and Americans know they should not have to forgo personal privacy for safety. As we work to make our country more equitable, we cannot ignore the technologies that stand in the way of progress and perpetuate injustice. This legislation is about rooting out systemic racism and stopping invasive technologies from becoming irreversibly embedded in our society, and that means that law enforcement should not be using facial recognition tools today

United States Senator

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)

Facial recognition technology has been plagued with far too many problems for any government to use it responsibly. This technology has been misused against peaceful protestors, sent innocent people to jail and has proven to misidentify Black Americans and people with dark skin at elevated rates. I am proud to join in introducing legislation to put facial recognition tech on ice until there is proof it can be used effectively and safely

United States Senator

#Events

Fundraising events,Please join.

Across the country, communities are organizing to challenge the expansion of facial recognition and biometric surveillance. Public involvement matters. Attend local and national events, support advocacy efforts, and engage with policymakers working to protect privacy, consent, and civil liberties.

IAPP Global Privacy Summit 2026

30- 31 March

Data Privacy Week 2026

January 26-30th

#Events

We will together make the world better

Facial recognition mandates are expanding nationwide, embedding biometric surveillance into everyday civic systems. Requiring biometric identity checks for government services erodes privacy, consent, and due process. Americans must oppose compulsory facial recognition, challenge unchecked biometric enforcement, and demand verification systems that protect civil liberties without permanent biometric collection, retention, or secondary use.

Donate Now

There is no Democracy without Privacy, How privacy can save your life - Carissa Véliz

#Privacy

Stop Forced Biometric Surveillance !

Across the United States, unemployed workers are increasingly required to surrender biometric data to access basic benefits. This practice erodes privacy, due process, and informed consent. Public action can stop ID.me mandates, restore voluntary identity verification, and demand lawful, proportionate systems that protect civil liberties while preventing fraud without permanent biometric surveillance by government agencies.

Add Your Support